someone hasn't done their research

The Rockets and Americans met four times in Kelowna's first 31 games. So essentially they didn't see each other in the second half of the season. Is it fair to say the Rockets were a much different team in the second half? I think it is. The Americans didn't change much. They were as good in the first half as they were in the second half. You don't play consistent hockey all season long and come three wins shy of 50. They were darn good from start to finish. Hello - 97 points! (Regan's Rant)

Meanwhile, in Realityland, Wangler did the math:

The first 18 games of the season, AMS winning percentage was 0.833; the middle 36 games of the season, the percentage had dropped to 0.667.

The last quarter of the season, AMS sputtered along at 0.444. 

How that means "didn't change much", or is in any way"consistent" or even "darn good from start to finish," I'll never know.   I butchered that sentence.  Don't care.

Tomorrow's Thursday already and Round 2 starts Friday.  I should think about getting a Round 2 preview ready.  Or not.