Each week Buzzing the Net has their "Dynamic Dozen" from around the CHL. For the past couple of weeks Spokane has sat at the top. This week, Spokane has dropped to #4 and the Americans are in the 2nd spot. I thought for sure the Chiefs' 8-1 drumming of the Silvertips last night would put them back at the top, but honestly, I have no gomdamn idea how their ridiculous ranking system works. Supposedly:
Buzzing The Net uses Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) with a recency
factor. RPI combines a team's record with the strength of its opponents
to produce an overall rating. Our method also gives more weight to
recently played games. Shootout wins and losses are classified as ties
for philosophical and practical reasons. All three CHL leagues are
considered equivalent in quality.
So what did Sager have to say about our boys?
2. Tri-City Americans, WHL (.590, +2)— A changing of
the guard as far as the Dub's highest ranking team goes. Tri-City
fairly dominated the Spokane Chiefs with a 4-1 road win on Saturday.
Curiously, the Americans (12-5-0-0) are winning without any kind of power play (fifth-worst in the Dub). This is odd since their power play was pretty crackling the past two seasons.
Eighteen-year-old defencemen Mitch Topping and Zach Yuen, who are both
plus-13 on the year, are doing well anchoring a back end that only has
one player aged 19 or older. (BTN)
I've decided to come up with my own ranking system, but instead of the whole CHL, I'm keeping it in the WHL. In the US Division, actually (hence the title of the post). My rankings are based on the following:
- win percentage
- # of ugly-ass players on the roster
- strength of rivalry
It's very scientific and logical, just like Buzzing the Net.
1. Tri-City Americans. Obviously in the #1 spot. Win percent at .706 which puts them at the top of the division. Zero ugly-ass players, I mean seriously. Even Lukas Walter is better looking than anyone on the other US Division team rosters. I can't really use strength of rivalry since they aren't rivals with themselves, though I hear the scrimmages in practice get pretty heated. There's some game of "rebound" that the boys play as well as playing each other in NHL 12 that cause some (hopefully) friendly competition. But for real, the boys are really coming together, it took a bit longer to develop that chemistry than I had hoped for, but it's starting to click. Now if only the power play would stop being so dreadful...
2. Seattle Thunderbirds. Ok, they don't have the WORST win percentage in the division, but close. At .375 you'd think they'd be in last place, but they're not. T-Birds are sitting in my #2 spot partially because of pity points, they've been soooooo terrible for so long, I just feel bad for them. I especially feel bad for Calvin Pickard who deserves a better team in front of him. They don't have the ugliest team, though they are not up to the same level as the Americans. Goodness,
Calvin's got some crazy eyes in his roster pic. That will haunt my dreams, and not in the good way. Within the US Division, I'd say this is the weakest rivalry with the Americans, again I think a lot of that comes down to how much the T-Birds suck. A good rivalry develops when you have a competitive rival.
3. Everett Silvertips. Wow, what a shitty win %, sitting at .275. Ouch. The Tips have been decent for a number of years, since their entrance into the league, I suppose it's time for a rebuilding year in Everett. Maybe I shouldn't have used win % in my ranking LOL. They aren't an ugly team either, even their two Euros. As far as a rivalry, this is one that has gone up and down over the years, ever since the beginning and the Kevin Constantine years. I think there was some jealousy or something going on that angered a lot of other teams when this expansion team in their green jerseys were SO good as a new team. And for the first several years of their existence. I've never been to the Everett arena so I can't give my personal perspective, but I've heard from others that they have a relatively young/new hockey fan base and so they don't necessarily understand the ins-and-outs of the game. I suppose that was true at some point, but not sure any more. The Tips have been around long enough for fans to know what's going on. That does not, however, explain the "and he still sucks" proclamation from Everett fans. Ah well, who can explain fans, we got people taking their shirts off to Cotton-Eyed-Joe so who are Ams fans to talk I suppose.
4. Portland Winterhawks. Portland has a .600 win % and they've done their Central Division road swing so that's looking good for them. But they're butt ugly. Like Seattle, Portland was really shitty for a while. Unlike Seattle, they've gotten better. And that's when the rivalry heated up. The tradition of the Hawks gooning it up when they don't like how the game is going has carried over from the crappy days, which has intensified the rivalry.
5. Spokane Chiefs. At the bottom of the pile for obvious reasons. I don't care if they have a .679 win %, they've only played 4 away games. Also, they are so ugly. Even if some of the guys are ok looking,
this guy cancels that out. Actually it puts their looks in the negative department. Gross. In my magic rating system here which makes about as much sense as Buzzing the Net's, the intensity of the rivalry actually moves teams DOWN in the standings so of course Chiefs are at the bottom. It's the most intense rivalry in junior hockey*, sometimes moreso between the fans than the players. But sweet Jesus they are sure ugly.
*I have zero statistical data to back this claim up. Just like the rest of this post, actually.